SD-WAN After Go-Live: Why Optimisation Is Where Resilience Is Won or Lost

Most organisations treat SD-WAN deployment as a finish line. The migration is complete, applications are routing over the new fabric, and the business moves on. In reality, deployment is only the beginning.

SD-WAN environments don’t underperform because of poor technology choices. They underperform because optimisation stops when the project ends. What’s configured at go-live reflects a set of assumptions made at a moment in time — assumptions that quickly fall out of step as networks, applications and user behaviour evolve.

Without deliberate Day 2 optimisation, SD-WAN environments drift. Visibility degrades, performance becomes inconsistent, and resilience quietly erodes.

Why Day 2 Matters More Than Day 1

SD-WAN is designed to improve application performance, cost efficiency and resilience through centralised policy and dynamic path selection. Those benefits depend on continuous monitoring and adjustment, not static configuration.

In operational environments, many issues aren’t hard outages. They’re gradual degradations across the path — latency, packet loss, jitter, DNS or SaaS dependencies — that are difficult to detect without proactive visibility. Active (synthetic) monitoring is commonly used to identify and isolate these issues before they materially impact users (ThousandEyes, n.d.).

In SD-WAN environments, these blind spots typically emerge after deployment as:

  • SaaS usage grows
  • traffic patterns shift
  • applications are reprioritised
  • security policies increase in complexity

Without structured Day 2 practices, teams are left reacting to symptoms rather than managing performance proactively.

The Hidden Cost of “Set-and-Forget” SD-WAN

Across operational SD-WAN environments, three Day 2 failure patterns appear consistently.

Policy drift

Routing and application policies that made sense at go-live no longer reflect real-world usage, leading to inconsistent application experience.

Loss of end-to-end visibility

Teams lack clear insight across underlay links, overlay paths and application performance, making root-cause analysis slow and inconclusive. Cisco’s SD-WAN operational guidance highlights the importance of ongoing monitoring and telemetry to support optimisation after deployment (Cisco, n.d.).

Operational ambiguity

Ownership of optimisation sits uncomfortably between networking, security and operations teams, resulting in delayed or fragmented response.

Left unaddressed, these issues undermine the very resilience SD-WAN is intended to deliver.

Optimisation Is an Operating Model, Not a Feature

Effective SD-WAN optimisation is not about occasional tuning. It requires a repeatable operating cadence that includes:

  • continuous performance monitoring across applications and transport paths
  • early detection of latency, loss and jitter trends
  • regular review of policies against application criticality
  • correlated visibility across network and application layers

Operational best-practice guidance for SD-WAN environments consistently emphasises proactive monitoring and observability as the foundation for sustaining performance over time (Kentik, n.d.).

This approach shifts optimisation from reactive troubleshooting to ongoing performance management.

From Performance to Resilience

Resilience isn’t just uptime – it’s consistent application experience under change.

When Day 2 optimisation is treated as a core operating discipline, organisations are better positioned to:

  • maintain performance as demand fluctuates
  • adapt routing and policy as applications and threats evolve
  • introduce new sites, users and workloads without degradation

In this context, SD-WAN becomes more than a connectivity platform. It becomes an enabler of operational resilience.

Why Many Teams Struggle With Day 2

Despite recognising its importance, many organisations struggle to operationalise SD-WAN optimisation due to:

  • tool sprawl across networking, security and monitoring platforms
  • limited internal capacity to sustain continuous tuning
  • difficulty translating telemetry into actionable insight

These challenges help explain why many organisations move towards managed SD-WAN operating models – not because SD-WAN is “set and forget”, but because maintaining SLA-grade outcomes typically requires ongoing underlay + overlay visibility, performance assurance, and faster fault isolation (Cisco, n.d.).

Optimisation as a Foundation for What Comes Next

Well-optimised SD-WAN environments do more than perform reliably. They establish the visibility, control and consistency required to support more advanced capabilities – including automation, analytics and AI-assisted operations.

But those outcomes depend on disciplined Day 2 practices today, not promises made at deployment.

If this article has raised questions about how well your own SD-WAN environment is being optimised, reach out for a confidential discussion with one of our experts.

Related Insights

2 June 2025

Summer IT Sprints: A Smarter Way to Build Future-Ready Schools

3 July 2023

Critical Infrastructure Services

27 October 2024

S4-6: Matt Maw on Modernising the Gaming Experience

Join us as Matt Maw shares his transformative journey from bricks-and-mortar operations to spearheading digital change in the gaming industry, promising insights into maintaining revenue streams amidst diverse regulations.

Explore our Resources​

Network
post
SD-WAN After Go-Live: Why Optimisation Is Where Resilience Is Won or Lost
General
post
Just Because You Can Doesn’t Mean You Should
General
post
Human-Led, AI-Assisted Security
Critical Infrastructure
post
Taking Back the Keys: Why Self-Custody Will Define Critical Infrastructure Security in 2026
General
post
The Rise of the “Chief Integration Officer”
Retail
post
Retail’s Experience Problem: Why AI-Native Networks Are Now a Competitive Advantage